Thursday, June 11, 2009

Advanced Programming


Would it be possible for someone or something to ever create a creature that could not only self replicate, but evolve?

Would it be possible for someone or something to ever create a program so sublime, that it would be able to start from nothing more than the ingredients necessary to create a creation.. and from that, create a program and a creation which could self replicate and evolve?

Would it be possible for someone or something to ever create a program which could create a basic structure of existence from which a secondary program would spontaneously arise which would evolve into a creature that would self-replicate and evolve and become conscious to the point of figuring out how the program to create a structure of reality and then a program to create itself could evolve and replicate, culminating in figuring out the program, but also come to understand the constituent parts of the program and how to create a program that could do the whole thing all over again? as well as come to understand itself to the extent that who it was, what it was, how it got here/now would also be figured out?

Do you think that would ever be possible? or would such a situation be "untraceable"?

and if it were possible, which of the above elements of the event be regarded as the most difficult, impossible, or miraculous?

And what would it mean if the thing doing the deeming of that which would be regarded as the most difficult, impossible or miraculous were a creation, representing the culmination of all of the above?

And could the answer ever be proven as being meaningful outside of the reason of the beings asking and answering the questions?

In terms of what we currently know about programming, it would have to be said that such an achievement, should it ever be achieved, would have to be thought of, as exemplifying a level of knowledge far beyond which we now know as being possible.

which brings us to the underlying question behind all of this:
"If such program could never be created, then how can they say such a program happened by chance?"

is it an underlying characteristic of our existence that it "creates" spontaneously by "chance"? the answer is undoubtedly, "yes", however, our understanding of "chance" in this circumstance, is a tip of the hat to a process that is of such potency and ungraspable, ungropeable comprehension, that learned men, can find no other way to explain it other than chance.

I will simply say, that from the youngest age of my exploration of the truths of our existence, I've always found darwin's genius to be less than true genius. The statue has feet of clay. He may have thurst humanity forward in it's ability to comprehensively explain a process that has gotten far from the barn, yet, it does not go far enough to come close to explaining our current condition. Religion has the same problem as science, in that it is incapable of envisioning a "reason"

What science calls "chance" religion calls "god" and so they are both equidistant from the inner truth. it is not chance and it is not god. it is everything. the alpha and the omega. the beginning, the truth and the reason.

the nature of which will be discussed in following writings.

No comments: