Friday, February 29, 2008

Angola: the transition from slavery to the modern prison industrial complex



The similarity of the Angola slave plantation to Angola the penal institution is virtually indistinguishable. Even the process of entrapment in Africa and the journey to the New World to the process of arrest to incarceration is similar. In place of the trading company, there is the U.S. government. The kidnappers and slave traders are faithfully represented by the criminal justice system and executed by law enforcement agencies. The abduction is substituted by the arrest. The slave ship journey through the middle passage is represented by county jail, plea-bargaining and trial. Finally, there is the sale (conviction, sentencing and the jury/judges decision) concluding with the final delivery to the plantation (prison) and hard labor (no substitute necessary).

Once in prison, there is a physical approximation with similar intent and considerations between the slave hold and the prison cell. As Dr. Dennis Child's states "The slave ship and the constricted space of the prison cell-underlines a direct spatial correlation between two putatively distinct systems of captivity. The area allotted to one black man aboard the slave ship Brookes -six feet by one foot four inches-directly resembles the specifications of today's jail cells." In reality, all comparisons pale in respect to one major similarity. 80% of the convicts at Angola are black.

At Angola prison there is one way that the prison distinguishes itself from the plantation and that is in sheer brutality and the amount of spilled blood. For the first 100 years of the prison the brutality exceeded that of the former plantation. In the early years the prisoners were used in any way those in power saw fit.

Further degradations pervaded the slave-master mentality of those in charge at Angola. For instance, the Minstrel show mentioned above "...where inmates at the all black barrack were given the privilege of traveling around the area immediate to the prison grounds if they donned burnt cork and performed " And not to be forgotten is the ongoing yearly "rodeo", where inmates are regularly maimed and seriously injured as they jump into a gladiator type ring before a paying public for prize money that typically does not exceed $50, which represents almost 8 months wages at the current 4 cents per hour.

Despite the similarity to chattel slavery as exemplified through the similarities and degradations mentioned above, the larger point is that chattel slavery and the idea of the inferiority of blacks within the southern plantation economy served as the model for the modern penal institution in the United States. It took but a few minor nuanced transmutations for whites to adopt the culture of slavery and codify it into a new system that once again remanded blacks into their previous position as the lowest caste. Once that was achieved, prisons became the de facto symbol of a new geographic apartheid, a tangible symbol of white power and a high tech form of institutional racism and a source of shame in the international community.

This transformation occurred shortly after and through emancipation and reconstruction. In this way the abstract notion of Black freedom and Black rights granted to packs of recently emancipated, yet confused and hopeful slaves, was swept and shoveled away. And the south which had momentarily risen in fright to look curiously down upon these Blacks to see what they would do and how they would do it, once again comfortably eased themselves down into the comfort of the prior order. And so before it had the chance to take a single breath, the possibility for advancement and the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness were exorcised from the imaginations of blacks in the north and south alike.

History shows that prior to emancipation, there was no formalized "prison system" in the United States. Although Auburn prison was built in 1817 and the Western Prison "panopticon" in Pennsylvania was constructed in 1826 (and it's first inmate a Black man), it took the end of the Civil war for the Current prison system in the United States to gain ground and full-scale implementation. Before the Civil War, the great majority of Louisiana's convicts were white. When the Civil War freed the slaves and granted them the rights of citizenship, overnight, in Louisiana and the other Southern prisons, the prison population became predominantly black. In Louisiana and in the other states that established large prison farming operations, "convict," "slave," "Negro," and "farm work" became synonymous terms in the public and political mind.

Angola Prison or, "The Farm" sits in Louisiana, on 18,000 acres bordering the Mississippi river, a geography that lends itself to the habitation of alligators, snakes and impassable miles of swamp such that it is the only high security prison in the nation with no walls. Originally, a slave plantation, in 1865 it was born again in 1880 as the new Louisiana State Prison when Major James purchased an 8,000-acre plantation in West Feliciana Parish called "Angola", named for the area in Africa where most of the slaves in that region came from. Prisoners worked its fields, and lived in the former slave quarters and most of the "hard labor" was done in the form of levee construction throughout the state.

The prisoners, having been leased to Major James and his family, were used and rented out in any way Major James saw fit to profit from the fruit of the inmates labors with little regard for the perilous nature of the work or the resultant body count. In 1901 the State of Louisiana resumed control of the inmates, ending 55 years of the lease system. At this time the Louisiana Board of Control purchased the land from Major James. Under the new state system the death rate among inmates was reduced by 72%. The Annual Report of the Louisiana State Penitentiary, from 1901, shows that the last seven years of the lease to Major James, (from 1894 to 1900), 732 convicts, averaging over 100 a year, died. Convicts lives were virtually worthless. In slavery, the plantation owner had an investment. In incarceration, the lives are "free" and there are always replacements.

Briefly, in 1903 and 1912 floods ruined the crops and put Angola in economic chaos much to the consternation of the cash strapped Louisiana State government. By 1916 the inmates were once again leased out due to financial considerations. Mr. Henry L. Fuqua was named general manager of the penitentiary. One of Mr. Fuqua's first moves was to fire almost all of the security officers at Angola and replace them with inmate trusty guards. In a series of eight purchases in a year and a half, Henry Fuqua purchased 10,000 acres of land, removed the remaining free sharecroppers, which brought Angola to its present size of 18,000 acres.

As late as 1961, The Louisiana Corrections' budget was drastically reduced and a period of decline began and Angola became known as "The Bloodiest Prison in the South". Up until the 1950's any sentence longer than 3 years was considered a death sentence, seeing as it was the rare exception that an inmate survived more than 3 years. The use of trustee's (who were virtually all white) rather than guards and the expectation of a high death rate were all factors in Angola being generally regarded as the "worst" and the "bloodiest" prison in the United States as well as the prison most like that of plantations long passed. It wasn't until 1994 that the American Correctional Association (ACA) accredited Angola, which is a certification that the institution is "stable, safe and constitutional"

Angloa also has some other traits that link it directly to the legacy of slavery. Its convicts have always done farm work and over 99% of inmates that are certified as being physically able to work do so. Currently these inmates grow over 4,000,000 pounds of soybeans, corn, squash and potatoes to feed all of Louisiana's prisoners. Angola is also extremely isolated and located in a remote part of the state making it hard to visit and it's expanse is such that questionable prison practices are easy to keep out of the eyes of visitors and advocates. Angola has always had a "master-servant" relationship scheme with guards in the fields mounted on horseback with shotguns and up until the mid-19th century, whips. Convicts dwell in an over 100-year culture of subservience to their keepers who exercise absolute authority.

Convict leasing developed as a way for the state of Louisiana to maintain a virtual prison without the expense of an actual prison. The first leaseholder at Angola was the private firm of Mc Hatton Pratt and Company. The major form of work they engaged in was a large-scale public works. Leased inmates would live on the plantations on and live within former slave quarters.

Convict leasing is an exceptionally brutal form of hard labor. The death rate of prisoners leased to railroad companies between 1877 and 1879 was 16 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Arkansas, and 45 percent in South Carolina. And this type of brutal work was reserved for Black inmates almost exclusively. In 1878 1,239 Georgian inmates were leased out. Only 115 of them were not Black. Inmates not leased simply worked the plantation at Angola. This system was racist, profitable and on a level of brutality rivaling the Nazi death camps and Stalinist work camps. The brutality was to a point that southern whites who were already desensitized to the brutality of Black servitude lead a public outcry to end the leasing practice. In 1952 31 inmates cut their Achilles' tendon as protest to the brutal conditions, which combined with the public outcry that eventually led to a series of reforms and the end of inmate leasing. Convict leasing ended in the mid-50s at Angola, whereas by the 1930s, every other state in the nation had abolished the practice of convict leasing.

Official chattel slavery began in the new world in 1619 when John Rolfe landed in Jamestown with 20 African slaves. In the next year, 1620, 11 black slaves of African and mixed ethnicity were introduced in New Amsterdam. Working side by side with white indentured servants, these men labored to lay the foundations of New York. At this time, there were no laws defining limitations placed on slaves. Slaves could bring suits to court, earn wages and legally marry. Soon this all changed as the agricultural economy grew and the profits of the planters and the economics of the burgeoning plantation system called for more laborers. How this need transformed itself into the descent into slavery occurred over several stages, over several years from both economic expediance provided the impetus for legalizing racial oppression.

In the 1640s the English definition of who can be enslaved begins to shift from non-Christian to non-white. By 1661, a Virginia court legalizes slavery and decides that children born will be free or slave “according to the condition of the mother”. In 1691 landowners pass a law stating that it is illegal to free a black slave. And in 1750 Virginia passes laws relegating all slaves to the status of property.

After the Stono Rebellion on 1739 the “Negro Act is passed which takes away African’s freedom of movement, assembly and outlaws their right to earn money or to read. This act becomes the model for slaves throughout the colonies. This is the first act that not only codifies and seals slavery as a legacy in this country, but this series of acts from 1640 to 1739 sets a legal precedent that is enforced today as the current legalized system of incarceration of blacks, denying them opportunities for economic advancement (home loans, business and farm loans, credit, etc) and denies them access to educational opportunities.

From the construction of Wall Street, to the tending of the fields to the comfort offered to the White masters through the raping of the Black womb as well as the profits made form the children of such unions the economic gains of enslaving Africans is the most important factor in the making of America as a superpower.

There has always been a dual purpose to slavery, to enrich Whites and to serve as an example of the white races' dominion over the earth and all it's creatures. The principle, through time, justified by various substituted and legally justified means is that blacks are inferior and to be exploited, segregated, manipulated and excluded at every turn. And so when slavery was outlawed in 1865, the entire United States, lead by the former confederate states frantically worked to re-engineer itself in spatial, legal, political and economic terms so as to codify the new calculus of institutionalized racism. And yet, throughout this monumental effort, whites have continually professed that the black is inferior and that it is through no action of their own that blacks have found themselves in their current state. Such lies are manufactured and supported ironically to maintain the integrity of the principles of America as a land of freedom and opportunity. In the final analysis, the investment of esteem by the white race as being superior, and the maintenance of a racial hierarchy is dependent on the continuing propaganda war of blacks inferiority as the primary, secondary and tertiary explanations of all current disparities.

Today, such arguments remain as well understood, accepted and unspoken truths just below the surface of all analysis, discussion and awareness of black oppression; for if black are not being discriminated against and they are not being unfairly targeted, and institutionalized racism and codified practices are not to explain for the vast disparities, what is left for the individual of average intelligence to conclude? Can it not be a consideration that perhaps blacks are inferior and that this is the underlying, all encompassing explanation?

Blacks are the most disempowered political and racial group. A condition that came about due to the multi-generational effect of law, racism, oppression and impoverishment. As such there is little resistance to blacks being targeted unfairly. for 400 years, the image of blacks as prone to violence, shiftlessness and immoral has represented a social investment of racist and business interest as a means to support the institution of slavery. To be able to point to the wholesale incarceration of black males is a tangible offering to the community that fits in with their pre-disposed ideals of criminality and serves to justify the claims of a greater level of safety and that more police are justified. Politician’s on every level have beat the horse of black incarceration to death on the campaign stump, and with the success that such shows have garnered there is no signs of this trend fading.

The counter-culture movement flew in the face of the status quo. In combination with the civil rights movement, the proletariat underground within the United States was on the verge of making real change in terms of recognizing the potential of Blacks, the rewards of freedom and gaining support both politically, academically and socially for a pro-empowerment agenda. Lead by this surge of hopefulness, blacks were looking for real opportunities, as groups such as the Black Panthers, the Deacons of Defense, SNCC, CORE, NAACP and liberal and radical white allies came together with University professors and previously disaffected white college students that now found themselves being sent off to war.

On the other side was Nixon and his "silent majority", Cointelpro lead by J. Edgar Hoover and domestic counter-surveillance, which teamed with local law enforcement agencies and snitches to provide the motive for wholesale destruction. Cointelpro, successfully stifled Black, Native-American and radical white leadership through the planting of evidence, assassination, illegal wiretaps, propaganda, false confessions, infiltration and character assassination. The U.S. government expanded and systematized the legal strategies learned through such operations and domesticated it into the current state of repression. White allies backed down, as they witnessed the unchallenged strength of the government and their realization that they would be allowed to flee while black bodies were battered and slaughtered.

A traditional fear and paranoia of Blacks by white oppressors has been the hallmark of the ongoing propaganda war. Just as in the invasion of Iraq, all manner of illegal killings, wars, human rights abuses, etc, are justified through the portrayal of "the other" as an imminent threat to the U.S., our philosophy, our safety or our way of life. yet, there is no threat or blow to counter. So the pre-emptive strike is necessarily pre-emptive. Evidence is manufactured, coalitions of conservative whites and upper crust minorities move together while manufactured consent is obtained to target innocent parties with illegal acts based on the philosophy of "self-defense".

As an example, contrast the treatment of groups such as MOVE and The Black Panthers with white groups like the Weathermen and the citizen's commission to investigate the FBI. The Weathermen attempted to stage a well-publicized riot through the streets of Chicago, destroying property as hundreds of Chicago police officers watching. There were few arrests and no serious sentences handed out. The Weathermen were responsible for two bombings, one of a police statue and a Greenwich Village apartment where three weathermen were killed. Years later, Jimmy Carter offered ‘amnesty’ to draft dodgers and despite the bombings and threats, most of the weathermen were pardoned and allowed to assume their previous positions in society with a few receiving probation.

The citizen's commission to investigate the FBI broke into an FBI office and stole over 1,000 classified documents. No one was every caught or charged. Meanwhile, the Black Panthers who were called, "the greatest threat to internal security of the country" by J. Edgar Hoover were slaughtered, (Bobby Hutton, Fred Hampton) and dozens were jailed, framed or run out of the country. According to Angela Davis, "Police, assisted by federal agents, had killed or assassinated over twenty black revolutionaries in the Black Panther Party.”

The disparity in cocaine sentencing laws is an efficient means to imprisoning blacks as a way of demonstrating effectiveness of drug enforcement. Meanwhile high level drug dealers, such as Manuel Noriega, who was a CIA informant, and leader of a country that allowed millions of tons of cocaine to be trafficked into the U.S. served only 20 years of a 40 year sentence. The United States Attorney negotiated deals with 26 different drug felons, who were given leniency, cash payments, and allowed to keep their drug earnings in return for testimony against Noriega. Contrast this with Louisiana state law that doles out a sentence of 10-30 years for cocaine "manufacture" (any amount). Cocaine laws are a farce, the only purpose they serve is to incarcerate Blacks and to give the perception of law enforcement effectiveness. Once again, the primary factor is race, the ability to purchase a defense, and the perception of law enforcement effectiveness against a system of drug trafficking that the highest levels of the government is complicit in.

Reported Gary Webb of The San Jose Mercury News. The three-part series, "Dark Alliance," asserted that members of the CIA's army in Nicaragua helped spark a crack cocaine explosion in urban America in the 1980s. The report said two Nicaraguans, sold tons of cocaine to a well-known Los Angeles drug dealer, with the knowledge of the U.S. government. The articles said these two Nicaraguans funneled millions of dollars in profits to CIA-backed rebels fighting the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua with the CIA’s knowledge, logistical support and protection.

The fact that 1/4 blacks are either on parole, probation, in jail or in prison removes several million individuals from competition for jobs, educational opportunities, housing, social programs and most importantly, from addressing these social ills through political means by way of felony disenfranchisement. As of 1999, 1,367,100 black men have been denied the right to vote, and that number is growing (also from Shalom, 2000). This group is one of many whose disenfranchisement won George W. Bush the 2000 election. Incarceration is but part of the overall equation. Allowing/facilitating large quantities of drugs and weapons to filter into the community provides a convenient means of demonstrating criminal justice effectiveness when law enforcement “stings” take place after the body count has reached a high enough level.

Dilapidated social programs, that lead to poor health care, nutrition, and educational opportunities and the effect of broken families, torn apart by the influx of cheap drugs, weapons, lack of opportunity and the educational opportunities needed to garner employment and living wages. for every Black man incarcerated, there are one to several children growing up without a father and a mother struggling to provide for them.

Another side of the formula is the self-fulfilling prophecy, of the inability of Black students to compete or pay for college and higher educational opportunities due to poor schools, disrupted families and proven racist admissions criteria such as standardized test scores, extra weight given to suburban and rural schools, enriched facilities, higher income levels and extra points for advanced placement classes.

Summary
The modern prison industrial complex is a simple extension of the legacy of slavery in this country. Through enforced policies that guarantee disparity to unfairly targeting black neighborhoods, racial profiling and disparities in drug sentencing, blacks are incarcerated at a rate 8.2 times the rate of whites nationwide. In sentencing, blacks receive poorer defense, longer sentences and are less likely to be awarded parole. Through felony disenfranchisement, a disproportionate amount of black males have lost the right to vote as well as eligibility to a host of enrichment and self-improvement opportunities such as housing, job training, educational grants and loans as well as any job that requires a background check.

Black communities have been devastated through neglect and the destruction of the black household and an emphasis on law enforcement that has robbed the community of social service programs. Black schools have less experienced teachers, less enrichment opportunities, poorer facilities and materials. Black students are more likely to be expelled, suspended and placed in remedial classes while being denied advanced placement opportunities that are given to white with equal or lower ability. In higher educational opportunities, disparities exist in recruitment and the provision of scholarships and grants, which are largely based on standardized tests that show no correlation to academic performance and are most highly correlated with income of the family of origin. In addition, with the spiraling cost of tuition, blacks are at a disadvantage, as many whites are able to tap into home equity to pay for college, whereas for blacks, through the systemized enforcement of redlining and collusion with banks and lending organizations, were denied the opportunity to partake in the greatest form of wealth creation in this nations history –home ownership.

Many of the laws and strategies are thinly and often times undisguised continuations of policies developed for through the course of this nation’s 450 years of legalized slavery. When slavery ended there was the black codes and Jim crow, today, through felony rights losses, curfews in certain neighborhoods, gang affiliation laws restricting the movement of parolees and felons, as well as denial of federally subsidized housing, many blacks are living under new “black codes”.

In order to address these disparities and inequities will require a wholesale overhaul of not only the criminal justice system, but also the laws, prosecution priorities, law enforcement strategies, and access to enrichment, health, welfare and higher educational opportunities. Such changes will be very hard seeing as this nation has codified and created a system that relies as heavily on cultural and economic exclusion today, as it did racial exclusion in the past. Such changes will require that all individuals, all Americans demand equity and specifically, that white Americans be willing to exchange the advantages of white privilege for equality and no longer silently comply with these systems simply because it makes them feel “special” “intelligent” or that they simply benefit from them.

It is highly doubtful that such changes will take place. The prognosis is poor. This nation is simply too heavily invested in maintenance of the current system that creates bountiful opportunities for whites, by blocking opportunities for blacks. One of the major problems is that whites wish to pretend that they are at an advantage through “hard work” and that they have “earned” their fruits. They simply do not want to see the vast benefits of white privilege that literally hang in the air for their asking.

In the final analysis, conditions for black Americans today are as dire as they have ever been in a nation that professes to be “free”, and where all may pursue and enjoy the fruits of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Professor Thomas Henry Huxley on "The Negro Question" & "The White Man's Burden


Professor Huxley

President of the British Royal Society
President of the British Geological Society
President of the British Association at Liverpool
member of the London School Board
Fellow of The Royal Society
Awarded The Royal Medal 1852 (a year before Charles Darwin)
The Copley Medal in 1888
the Darwin Medal in 1894
the Wollaston Medal in 1876
the Linnean Medal in 1890


Keep in mind that the following treatise was stated by a man that said, "I would rather be the offspring of two apes than be a man and afraid to face the truth."

"Up to this moment, Mr. President and gentlemen, I have treated of this question of the differences between the various modifications of the human species as if it were a matter of pure science. But you must have felt, as I have felt that there loomed behind this veil of abstract argumentation the shadow of the ‘irrepressible negro,’ and of that great problem which is being fought out on the other side of the Atlantic. I have no desire, and, indeed, no right, to discuss the vast and difficult question of slavery here; but to set myself free from the suspicion of unreasoning partisanship, I may be permitted to say this much: that I am unable to understand how any man of warm heart can fail to sympathise with the indomitable courage, the warlike skill, the self-denying persistence of the Southerner; while I can as little comprehend how any man of clear head can doubt that the South is playing a losing game, and that the North is justified in any expenditure of blood or of money, which shall eradicate a system hopelessly inconsistent with the moral elevation, the political freedom, or the economical progress of the American people. As a man of science, however, my concern is not with the merits or demerits of slavery, but with the scientific arguments by which both sides have striven to support their cause.

"The fanatical abolitionists do not scruple to affirm that the negro is the equal of the white man–nay, some go so far as to tell us that the Ameri[9]can stock would be the better for the infusion of a little black blood; while the milder sort maintain, at least, the indefinite modifiability of the negro, urge that he is capable of being improved into such equality or something like it, and therefore conclude that the attempt to improve him is a great duty. The two former propositions are so hopelessly absurd as to be unworthy of serious discussion. The third is fairly open to discussion; but anything like good evidence of its truth seems to me to be wanting; while, if it be true, the conclusion drawn from it is not indisputable. But I must freely admit that the aberrations from scientific fact or fair speculation, on the anti-slavery side, are as nothing compared with the preposterous ignorance, exaggeration, and misstatement in which the slave-holding interest indulges. I hold in my hand an address to a scientific body of this country which has recently been published,1 and has, I doubt not, been read by many as an authoritative expression of the results of scientific: and you shall judge for yourselves whether it does or does not merit the stigma of public condemnation, which I think it my duty to take this opportunity of affixing to it.

"‘The skeleton of the negro can never be placed upright. There is always a slight angle in the leg, a greater in the thigh bones, and still more in the body, until in some instances it curves backwards.’

"‘The blood is vastly dissimilar–-the molecular [10] movement within the discs differs in every respect, and, when tried with a solution of potass, the protrusions from the cell-walls take every intermediate form, reverting with great rapidity to the normal condition.’

"‘The hair is very peculiar–three hairs, springing from different orifices, will unite into one.’

"Many among you are histologists, and will appreciate the value and practical applicability of the tests of species described in the two last paragraphs I have cited. A male negro skeleton is before you, and all can see how far it is or is not capable of the erect posture: and yet the author of the address in question can write thus:

"‘The above intelligent remarks, although they contain nothing new, are chiefly valuable from the fact that ladies in the Confederate States seem to be better informed on the subject than many men of science in this country’ !!

"This quotation is from the preface; gems of a purer water are to be found in the body of the address–‘Vrolik has asserted that the pelvis of the male negro bears a great resemblance to that of the lower mammalia.’

"Vrolik was far too truthful a man and too good an anatomist to say anything of the kind. What he really says in speaking of the male negro is:–‘The pelvis also presents many indications of the greater animality of the negroes;’ and further:–‘Had this pelvis been taken from a wild beast, its substance could not have been denser, nor its bones stronger.’

Again, the author of the address affirms that, [11] in the negro, ‘The pia mater contains brown spots, which are never found in the brain of a European.’ This is in the teeth of M. Gubler‘s paper, published in the memoirs of the French Anthropological Society three years ago, and distinctly proving the existence of a similar coloration in Europeans of dark complexion. ‘Not only,’ says this writer, ‘does the brain, enveloped in its membranes, present a bistre tint, but a layer of black matter, altogether comparable to that of the negro, covers the pons varolii, the medulla oblongata, and some other parts of the nervous centres.’ What makes the matter worse is, that M. Gabler‘s paper is mentioned in a note of the address to which I refer, as if it confirmed, instead of diametrically contradicting, the statement in the text.

"Again, we are told–‘The inferior molars sometimes present in the negro race five tubercled; and this anomaly is sporadically found in other races. It has been noticed in the European and the Esquimaux, but it is affirmed by my friend Mr. Carter Blake to be more frequent in the negro, and Australian than any other race.’"

Truly this is a notable discovery. We shall hear next that the scapula and the femur are ‘more frequent in the negro and Australian than any other race!’ In my previous lecture, when speaking of the dentition of man, I demonstrated to you the elementary fact, of which, up to this time, I did not imagine the merest tyro could be ignorant, that the lower molars of man are always typically five tubercled; the hindermost alone, [12] from its imperfect development, occasionally breaking the rule. A normal human lower jaw, with the first and second molar devoid of five tubercles would be a rare and interesting anomaly. But the author of the address is far surpassed by an American writer, whom he quotes apparently with entire approbation:–‘The negro,’ says this wonderful Anthropologist, ‘is incapable of an erect and direct perpendicular posture. The general structure of his limbs, the pelvis, the spine, the way the head is set on the shoulders–in short, the tout ensemble of the anatomical formation–forbids an erect position!’ I need only refer you to the excellent cast of a negro in our museum to enable you to judge of the veraciousness of this statement. Nothing, indeed, can surpass its scandalous absurdity, except the reasoning by which it is supported. ‘With the broad forehead and small cerebellum of the white man it is perfectly obvious that the negro would no longer possess a centre of gravity.’ This brief paragraph contains the most remarkable result of a modification of anatomical structure I have ever heard of. And the faculty for evolving nonsense displayed by its author will prepare you for my first citation, which I forbear to characterise, because the only appropriate phraseology would not be becoming for me to utter or you to hear. ‘Thus, an anatomist, with the negro and ourang-outang before him, after a careful comparison, would deem, perhaps, that nature herself had been puzzled where to place them, and had finally compromised the matter by giving them an exactly equal inclination to the form and alti[13]tude of each other.’ And this is put before the unsuspecting public, without comment or qualification, as the verdict of science touching ‘The Negro‘s Place in Nature!’"

After commenting upon these lectures of Professor Huxley, the editor of the Reader, says :–

"Clearly the high scientific authority of Professor Huxley is against the favourite notion of the partisans of slavery that there are signs about the negro that he has a place of his own in nature inferior to that of the normal man, and against the desired inference that he may fairly have a treatment corresponding to that place, and be excluded from rights and franchises that are agreed upon amongst men. Professor Huxley might have stopped here–for it was not necessary for him to say, as a man of science, what be might consider these rights and franchises to be. He might have vindicated the title of the Negro physiologically to whatever treatment is proper for human beings as such, and yet he might have believed in the necessity and expediency of slavery within that common society of human beings in which he had declared the Negro to be included. But be steps beyond the circle of the physiologist, and speaks strongly and generously his faith as a man. He believes in the doctrine of freedom, or equal personal rights for all men, and he pronounces the system of slavery to be root and branch an abomination–thus making his physiological definition of the ‘Negro‘s place among men equivalent to an earnest plea for Negro emancipation. Nay, as will have been noted, be goes farther, and, in [14] virtue of the strength of his feeling with respect to slavery, avows a state of opinion regarding the American War in which many who share his feeling with respect to slavery will refuse to go along with him."

Saturday, February 23, 2008

William "Frantz" Shakespeare: an analysis of Shakespeare and the black figure (with James Schultz)


















In the old age black was not counted fair,
Or if it were it bore not beauty’s name;
But now is black beauty’s successive heir,
And beauty slandered with a bastard shame,
For since each hand hath put on nature’s power,
Fairing the foul with art’s false borrowed face,
Sweet beauty hath no name, no holy bower,
But is profaned, if not lives in disgrace.
Therefore my mistress’ eyes are raven black,
Her eyes so suited, and they mourners seem
At such who, not born fair, no beauty lack,
Slandering creation with a false esteem:
Yet so they mourn, becoming of their woe,
That every tongue says beauty should look so.
-Sonnet 127 by William Shakespeare

There have been more than a few folks that think Shakespeare was a brother. They point to his pre-occupation with the condition of Blacks in 17th Century Europe and the fact that he carried on a passionate love-affair with a Black courteson in the neighborhood near the globe theater. Whether this is true or not, it does not change the fact that as a writer and social scientist, Shakespeare's treatment of blacks and their condition is a theme that he circles back to in his plays. His sensitivity in dealing with the subject of his black characters and the challenges of their race, as a factor in the complexity of their lives is one of the most enduring positive characterizations of blacks in the history of theater.

“Until now people have assumed that the Elizabethans did not know people of color,” says Shakespeare and English Renaissance scholar Imtiaz Habib, a fellow who penned a book titled, " Shakespeare and Race", that takes a look at the social, political and cultural impact of Shakespeare's treatment of racial issues (as exemplified in his plays). Habib states, “We now have documented proof of the residences of black people, which must be reckoned into the colors of Shakespeare’s world, in a very literal sense. Shakespeare knew people of color. He walked through their neighborhoods every day.”

Habib’s research is valuable for the way in which his thorough examination of race and colonialism played out in Elizabethan society. As in the Black experience of the time, the first Blacks who were brought to new worlds (Porugal, England, Spain) as well as the new world (Brazil, the Indies, Cuba and America) these involuntary exiles were the forerunners of much larger numbers to come, yet, in the early years, the collision of race and culture had yet to take on the air of racism, oppression and exploitation (per se as systemetized and politically expedited) and more or less were an exoticism and fetish of style and inquiry.

Mr. Habib's book documents the fact that as blacks were gradually absorbed into society, they were given Christian names, acquired skills, and dispersed into roles as, usually, laborers, menial workers, servants, maids and, for the aristocracy, entertainers. This cultural integration as well as intrusion lead to a pre-duboisian "double-consciousness" as the firm identiy of Blackness was shaken through transport and assimilation, and yet, there was no yearning or disconnection to the extent that a separate or second consciousness had experience or necessity to form. A visible minority in Shakespeare’s London, blacks attempted to carve out lives for themselves in what must have seemed an often bizarre majority culture in which they found themselves ensconced.

However superficial a role race might play likely didn’t occur to Shakespeare. With a keen eye for human behavior and attentive to detail, Shakespeare must have spent time pondering the differences between cultures as he passed or interacted with blacks in regular sojourns to see friends, visit pubs and attend rehearsals or performances at the theaters showing his plays. Yet, it was his intense sexual relationship with the un-named black woman that scholar Habib believes was an experience that so affected Shakespeare that he went on to incorporate aspects of it in such plays as “Titus Andronicus,” “Othello,” “The Tempest,” “Antony and Cleopatra,” “Henry VIII,” “Pericles,” peripherally in “The Merchant of Venice” and “A Midsummer Night’s Dream,” and explicitly and extensively in his sonnets.

Shakespeare’s black characters struggle between the twin dangers of cultural catalepsy and historical petrifaction; that is, between colonial subjugation and assimilation and anti-/post-colonial resistance. His tormented black characters are, of necessity, at once object and subject, feminized and patriarchal, demonized female and demonic male, victim and oppressor. This split position, Habib asserts, defines an unstable line between the sexualization of race and the racialization of sexuality in the dominant early modern English colonial discourse that both “writes” Shakespeare and is written by him.

Nevertheless, the black subject manages to mitigate that domination. Blacks resist and, paradoxically, whites come to depend on aspects of that resistance. “In exercising power, the colonizer ironically loses power,” Habib says. “He arrives; his technology is superior. He cannot be stopped. But he can be undermined over time.

By employing race in his plays, Shakespeare may ultimately have performed a great service. On one level, the fates of his black characters affirm cultural imperialism and the unfortunate pattern of one culture dominating and subsuming the other, yet, Shakespeare’s very depiction of cultural intersection offers hope that apparently intractable difficulties may eventually be resolved and by his placement of blacks so prominently within his plays, Shakespeare put persons of color into European culture, there to remain as a constant in racial discourse.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

"Perilous to us all are the devices of an art deeper than we possess ourselves."


We are in the age of the wizard...

not the age of the shaman...

there was once an alliance, a bond, until the wizard deceived the shaman, toppled him, seized the reigns of power and cast the shamans people into abject slavery.

The wizards and their spells, and their potions and their alchemy now hold full sway over earth.

chemistry, biology, physics, metallurgy, reproductive science, pharmacology, law, philosophy, agriculture... these are the perfected arts of the white man's wizardry.

through the use of their craft, they have been able to steal every inch of the earth, devise potions to change our very thought, create new creatures, plants, metals, fly to other planets and manipulate dna, the most hallowed possession of life itself.

but more importantly to humanity, they have been able to throw off the entire worlds non-white populace and doom it to dwell eternally in a state somewhere between purgatory and hell.

every craft they have mastered, has been bent upon their own tasks... they themselves control access to their schools of wizardry. one must study, believe in, and demonstrate a lust and reverence and specificity in purpose -an oath of allegiance to their craft- to gain admittance to their higher educational system.

meanwhile, the slaves, the serfs, the lowest class are doomed to dwell eternally in the muck and mire and effluvience that no longer is useful to their purpose.

"perilous to us all are the device of an art deeper than we possess ourselves."

Is it not true that the cutting edge of their science the very definition of that which we do not understand? does that lack of understanding not define the further direction of their quest? and yet, when we (people of color) choose to follow their road and path, and learn to wield and manipulate their tools and crafts to the detriment of ourselves and our fellow man, can we truly blame them? Or should we not rightfully blame ourselves? do we not have a responsibility to understand and delve into our craft, our humanity, which we have a birthright to, to understand ourselves and to possess our very selves to stem the tide of the wizards trickery and spell?

the wizard must be slain, his schools destroyed, his science burned and cast into an abyss never to arise again.

the unfulfilled promise of their art is that it will bring us peace, understanding and restore balance, and yet with every spell, we are brought one step closer to our doom. if a little bit is bad, then more must be better?

it has been said, in every tale of lore, that one day, the evil one will be toppled and the people made free again.

the promise will be fulfilled, must be fulfilled, if for no other reason, than all things being possible, the day of reckoning is but an eventuality. a promise that must be, and will be fulfilled.

Monday, February 4, 2008

Excerpt from, 1954's "The Negro People in American History" by W.Z. Foster


Upon assuming the office of President after the murder of Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson immediately launched his drive for Southern Reconstruction. On May 29, 1865, only six weeks after Lincoln's assassination, he took the first step with his Amnesty Proclamation. Under this agreement, all persons who had participated directly or indirectly in the rebellion, save certain groups, would have all their rights and properties (except the ownership of slaves) restored to them upon taking a loyalty pledge...

A major fact stood out clearly in Johnson's scheme - Negroes were not to be extended the right to vote. The whole plan was aimed at restoring the ex-slaveholders to political power at once. This was what Johnson intended and also what happened in fact. As early as July 15, 1865 Engels wrote of this situation to Marx: "If things go on like this, in six months all the old villains of secession will be sitting in Congress in Washington"...

While thus "reconstructing" themselves, eight Southern states worked out Black Codes (and the rest developed similar procedures) to establish planter domination and exploitation of the newly-freed slaves. While not identical, they all ran along similar lines. Civil liberties were severely restricted. The ex-slaves, of course, had no votes and could not serve on juries. They were prohibited marriage with whites. They were denied the commonly-practiced right of bearing arms. Their right to own land was restricted. They could not act as preachers without licence. They were prohibited from introducing unasked among whites. Any white man could arrest a Negro. Elaborate work regulations were prescribed. Negro workers were known as "servants" and employers as "masters." working hours on the farm were from sunup to sunset. Infraction of labor discipline brought fines. Negroes who left before the expiration of their labor contracts could be arrested and returnd with all costs charged against them. The masters could whip workers under 19 age of age, and older workers by judicial order. Mississippi even rejected a resolution prohibiting slavery...

In all when Congress met on December 5th, 1865, from the Confederacy sat Alexander Stephens, vice-president of the Confederacy, four Confederate generals, five confederate colonels, six confederate cabinet officers and 58 confederate congressmen...

-W. Z. Foster
Once the war was over and slavery outlawed by the 13th amendment, amendments 14, 15 and 24 were necessitated by continuing violations of the rights of african american to exercise their citizenship.

1865 - 13th amendment
outlawing slavery

1868 - 14th amendment
everyone born in the u.s. is a citizen and is accorded all rights of citizenship
1 vote per man (no longer 3/5th rule)

1870 - 15th amendment
once again, all citizens are citizens regardless of former servitude (ex-slaves)

1964 - 24th amendment
no poll tax shall be required to vote

The Reality Pill


we are in a world gone crazy with drugs.

like a 60's futuristic spoof, there's a pill for everything.

it's interesting how much these movies, like soylent greet, thx 1138, 1984 and the like have really hit it on the head. the culprit used to be uppers and downers. celebrities, entertainers and people in the public eye would take these pills to modulate their mood. to get up for a show, or come down after a show. to deal with the stress and strain of a glorious existence. in times gone past scotch, wine and opium did the trick. let's face it, like is stressful. but is it really more different now? well, yes. we have become masters of reality. but in the mastering of reality, have we gotten a bit too smart for ourselves? has our understanding of the human condition, the human mind and the intricate minutia of day to day modern life and our own trickery and lust lulled us down a dark corridor of inescapable drug/pill and pharmaceutical dependence?

let's look at the trend. increasingly individuals are being diagnosed with bi-polar disorder, depression, psychosis, anxiety and post-traumatic stress..... what that is, i understand completely, what it is, and how it's being used, i'm not really sure. diagnosis has now become a warren-report type preoccupation with it's own grassy knoll, lay experts, magic bullet theorist and conflicting opinions of attribution, conspiracy, gunners, and the like. children are being diagnosed as attention deficit, manic, anxious, depressed, psychotic by parents who are working and not present... my god. what kind of world do we live in where children are now robbed of their varying mental states and the attendant power to make sense of a world gone mad?

it's been said that insanity is a sane reponse to an insane world. but, the whole debate can rage on and on until the entire rain forest of sanity is whittled down to a toothpick, and individually, we will not be able to arrive at any form of truth outside of our own ability to discern it. (?). that is to say, we can not impose a "super" reality or "better" reality than the sober one we wake with when we are on nothing.

in the realm of what is "real" we have no choice but to somehow, divine it from within as we interpret that which is without. reality is the best pill, the best treatment, even in it's worst form. if we felt no stress, no pain, no depression, no euphoria, no anxiety, no neurosis, no paranoia, heard no voices, saw no sights, could not conceive of any form of twisted fantasy, then "we" would no longer be human. even if we felt "high" all the time it would not be "better" than the opportunity for sobriety. The only real high, is the high of being alive and feeling alive and experiencing life, in all it's beauty and wretchedness. reality is the gravy on the mashed potatoes of the mind.

no crutch, no dimunition, no sunglasses, balm, tincture or spell, should be allowed to interfere with this. none should be relied upon.

i guarantee you, if we felt high all the time and had to take a pill to feel the sobering effects of reality, then we would all be addicts. what a sad world we would live in, where we would have to get high, to essentially not be high. and isn't that what we are trying to do? isn't that what is happening where a pill is available for us to take strip a level of feedback off of our lives? if we had to get high to be sober, we would work for this high, we would sell our bodies for this high. we would do anything we had to, to get this wonderous drug. for this drug could provide infinite layers of nuance and complexity upon our state of mind and existence, and could offer us infinitely telescoping perspecives of stunning detail and pristine focus on all aspects of reality, past, present and future.

when we really look at it, (and thank god we don't have to, to BE able to look at it) the only real gift there is to be given is the gift of reality. reality, begat existence, existence begat matter, matter begat the universe, the universe begat planets, suns, rocks, energy. and that begat life. and life begat the opportunity to experience reality.

we should be trying to give reality to someone, to each other, to ourselves and to life. and we should be trying to live in it to the best of our ability together, indivdividually and for all time. our sole pre-occupation shoudl be trying to get in tune with it to abide by it...

as mental health professionals, doctors, theorist, educators, politicians, artists, parents, friends, family members, leaders, simple beings, we should be giving this opportunity to one another, creating opportunities for it to exist, be given birth to, to persist. we should be contemplating and meditating on it's "reality" and meaning. we should be praying to the god of "reality' and the reality of "god".....

....and if we are on drugs, or psychotropic medication, then we are blotting out the very sun of existence.

in the event that debilitating illness is present, or inhuman suffering is being experienced, then yes, let's alleviate that. let's break though that, let's heal that, give compassion and understanding to that, throw love upon it, caring into it, attention towards it, assistance out of it's dark recesses with humanity, warmth and tenderness..... but let us always strive to give the opportunity for individuals to experiece their birthright reality, to their fullest, and allow individuals to shine their light and personhood upon the world.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

the age of moral impossibility


I had a discussion with someone last night that was pretty upset over how stupid president bush is; how the deficit is higher, the war in iraq, the veto's, the interpretation of presidential power, etc. To be honest, I'm not too tickled over the situation either. In the last few days I've reviewed the 100% stolen election in Florida in 2000 and in Ohio in 2004. The mismanagement of Iraq. The lies perpetrated to force the nation into the Iraq war, and the deaf, dumb and blind senate and congress that stood by while all of the lies were perpetrated and did absolutely nothing.
But, the real problem isn't president bush, or anyone else. It's us. Joe Blow. Global warming? exploitation of developing nations, the raping and pillaging of our lands, seas, resources.... does it really make any difference who the president is, or who lives or dies when the systems and way of life that remains are rancid to the core, unsustainable and doing more harm? so what if 5,000,000 people die of starvation this year, if the upshot of our consuming of the world and destruction of the environment is that potentially 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 humans that could have been born, never get the chance because the earth has been destroyed, used up, poisoned, depleted and rendered useless for the pursuits that are meaningful to humans and all of gods creatures?
We've got much bigger fish to fry than georgie and opec.
and no one has the right to point a finger as long as they ride in a vehicle, switch a light, peel back some plastic on some food, or product, wear sweatshop clothes, use pharmaceuticals, eat a speck of animal products, use detergent......
the age of moral impossibility signals a call to everyone to do it "together" for we have reached a point where it is impossible to do it singly, or even alone.